Otterly AI vs Peec AI vs AI Peekaboo compared: pricing, platforms, prompt limits, and which wins for agencies and brands in 2026.
Filipe Lins Duarte
Three tools. Three different answers to the same question: how do you know if your brand shows up when someone asks an AI?
Otterly AI is built around prompt-based monitoring with GEO audits baked in. Peec AI focuses on citation intelligence and content gap analysis. AI Peekaboo was designed from day one for agencies, with white-label reporting and a lower entry price.
If you're choosing between them, here's what the numbers and the real-world experience actually look like.
| Otterly AI | Peec AI | AI Peekaboo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/mo (15 prompts) | €85/mo (50 prompts) | $50/mo (40 prompts) |
| Annual discount | ~11% | 15% | Not listed |
| AI platforms (base) | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot | Choose 3 from 7 | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode |
| Platform add-ons | Gemini/AI Mode ($9–$149/mo each) | €30–€140/mo per extra model | N/A |
| User seats | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| GEO audit | All plans | No | No |
| White-label | Agency Partner plan | Not available | Agencies (10+ brands) |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes | 14 days, no credit card |
| Best for | GEO-focused teams, agencies wanting audits | Research-driven SEO teams | Agencies, budget-conscious brands |
Otterly AI starts at $29/month for 15 search prompts, which sounds manageable until you try to use it seriously. Fifteen prompts across four base platforms doesn't go far if you're tracking multiple competitors or a handful of branded queries. The Standard plan at $189/month ($160/month annual) gets you to 100 prompts, which is where most real tracking starts.
The pricing structure has a catch worth understanding before you commit: Google AI Mode and Gemini are both paid add-ons, not included in the base coverage. On the Standard plan, each costs $59/month on top of your base price. That means a Standard plan with both add-ons runs $307/month, not $189. On Premium, those same add-ons push the total past $787/month.
Where Otterly genuinely stands out is the GEO audit. Every plan includes URL audits, starting at 1,000/month on Lite and scaling to 10,000 on Premium. This is the only tool in this comparison that includes auditing what content AI models are actually pulling from, not just whether your brand appears. If GEO content strategy is central to what you're doing, that feature alone separates Otterly from the field.
Unlimited team members on all plans is a real advantage. No seat taxes as your team grows.
What users say: On G2, Otterly consistently scores 9.8+ for ease of setup and support, and earned the Top AEO Platform award in the Best New Software Awards 2026. The praise centers on intuitive UI and fast onboarding. The Reddit conversation around Otterly is similarly positive on monitoring and hallucination detection, though users note the prompt-based limits mean most serious use cases end up on Standard or higher.
Peec AI takes a different approach. The platform tracks how AI models frame your brand in response to real user queries, with an emphasis on showing you what prompts drive citations and where content gaps exist. It raised $29M and built a reputation with research-oriented SEO teams, not just monitoring ones.
The pricing is in euros and starts at €85/month for the Starter plan: 50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project. You choose which 3 models from a list of 7 (ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok). If you need a 4th model, add-ons cost €30–€140/month depending on your plan.
Pro runs €205/month (150 prompts, 2 projects, 3 countries), and Advanced is €425/month (350 prompts, 5 projects, Looker/GA/GSC integrations). All plans include unlimited users, which is consistent with the others.
The "choose 3 models" structure is worth thinking through carefully. You're not automatically getting coverage across all major AI platforms. If your audience spans ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, you're choosing between them at Starter, or paying add-ons at Pro and Advanced.
One technical detail that sets Peec apart: it renders full browser-level AI answers rather than just checking text outputs. That means the screenshots and responses you see in the dashboard reflect what a user actually sees in the AI interface, including formatting and citations.
What users say: Peec AI holds a 5.0/5 on G2 from verified reviews, with praise focused on decision-quality insights. Crystal Carter (Head of SEO Comms at Wix) described it as showing "how LLMs are framing our brand" in a way that's hard to get elsewhere. Jon Gitlin noted using it to drive a "5x year-over-year increase in traffic and demo requests from LLMs." The Reddit consensus places Peec more in the research camp than monitoring: good at showing what kind of questions people ask LLMs and tying that back to content opportunities.
AI Peekaboo starts at $50/month and tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode on all plans. No add-ons needed to get the core platforms.
The Peek plan at $100/month adds daily tracking and Looker Studio exports. Grow at $200/month increases prompt volume to 100 and adds API access. All plans include unlimited user seats.
The white-label feature is for agencies managing 10+ brands, with custom pricing and volume discounts. If you're an agency, the model makes sense: one contract, branded client reports, custom pricing at scale. For individual brands on the standard plans, white-label isn't part of the package.
Where AI Peekaboo lags relative to Otterly is on GEO auditing. There's no URL audit feature baked in. The focus is on visibility tracking and reporting rather than content auditing. If you need to audit which pages are being cited by AI, you'd need a supplemental tool or Otterly.
Compared to Peec AI at the same prompt volume, AI Peekaboo comes in significantly cheaper. 40 prompts daily on the $100 Peek plan versus €85/month for 50 prompts on Peec's Starter (with only 3 models and no Looker integration). The platform coverage is also fixed and comprehensive on all plans rather than requiring you to choose and then pay for add-ons.
For GEO content auditing: Otterly AI is the only tool here that includes GEO URL audits. If understanding which content gets pulled into AI answers, and auditing it at scale, is central to your AI visibility strategy, Otterly's Standard or Premium tiers are the right call.
For research-driven SEO teams: Peec AI's approach to citation intelligence and content gap analysis is a strong fit if your main question is "what content should we create to appear in AI answers?" rather than "are we appearing right now?"
For agencies managing multiple client brands: AI Peekaboo's agency pricing with white-label reporting is built for this. Otterly has a white-label option too via the Agency Partner program, but at higher base pricing.
For smaller brands or teams starting out: AI Peekaboo's $50–$100/month entry range with all major platforms included beats both Otterly's $29 (15 prompts is very limited) and Peec AI's €85 (3-model restriction).
One thing worth flagging from Reddit discussions: a common critique across all three platforms is that LLM outputs are sensitive to prompt phrasing, which means week-to-week visibility changes don't always reflect actual brand position shifts. The most durable value across all three tools tends to come from citation tracking, which shows what content AI actually pulls from, rather than raw mention counts.
Full transparency: I am the Founder and CEO of AI Peekaboo, and we are included in this comparison. This review is based on published pricing, independent testing data, G2 reviews, and verified user discussions. I have represented each tool's strengths as accurately as its limitations, regardless of where that lands competitively.
I'm Filipe, the CEO & Co-Founder of Peekaboo. I lead all commercial and customer facing functions here at the company. I am obsessed about making sure our customers are heard and have a great experience with us!
See how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Gemini & Perplexity.
Continue exploring AI visibility insights
