Clear visibility opportunityCommercial Intent
What does a streamlined filing package cost?
0/100 visibility32 model responsesUpdated Sep 1
Find what AI content to write
Use AI content intelligence to plan your AI SEO work. Compare buyer questions, competitor mentions and cited sources, then choose which gaps deserve a content brief.
Find opportunities
Compare visibility
Review evidence
Export the brief
Content opportunities
Know what to improve next
Opportunity queue
Buyer questions worth reviewing
Visibility across all five supported models, Claude and Microsoft Copilot available as an add-onReady to reviewComparisons
Bright!Tax vs Greenback: which should I use?
46/100 visibility38 model responsesUpdated Sep 2
Ready to reviewBest in Category
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
66/100 visibility48 model responsesUpdated Sep 2
Gathering evidenceProduct Discovery
Which expat tax firms include CPA review?
8/100 visibility2 model responsesUpdated Aug 31
Waiting for 1 moremodel response
No tracked questions match this view.
Content opportunity, last 30 days
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
48AI answers analyzed
5Models observed
3Other entities found
3Next steps prepared
Bright!Tax is visible, but Taxes for Expats leads this buyer question.
Review the next steps first, then use the supporting evidence to shape the content plan.
15 point gapCoverage noteUse the brief as directional evidence. This run observed the five self-serve models; Claude and Microsoft Copilot tracking are available as an add-on. Check the full recorded answers before publishing a claim.
Your opportunity snapshot
Prompt evidence66of 100
ChatGPT84
Gemini76
Perplexity12
AI Overview82
AI Mode78
Recommended next steps
Rules-based1Review taxesforexpats.com as a research lead
It appears repeatedly in the recorded answers for this buyer question.
Source lead2Close the 15 point visibility gap
Taxes for Expats currently leads this tracked question.
Competitor gap3Improve coverage in Perplexity
This model has the weakest Bright!Tax visibility in the selected range.
Model gapWho appears in AI answers
Selected prompt| Entity | Visibility | Gap | Cited by |
|---|---|---|---|
 Taxes for Expats | 81 | +15 | |
| 66 | You | ||
 Greenback | 59 | -7 |
Citations observed for this prompt
Directional evidencetaxesforexpats.comObserved with the leading competitor5reddit.comCommunity source4
irs.govGovernment source3Treat these domains as research leads, not proof that a source caused an entity to appear.
How AI describes the market
48 confident resultsBright!Tax
Positive 80%Neutral 13%Negative 7%
Taxes for Expats
Positive 67%Neutral 27%Negative 6%
Trusted by brands
Trusted by agencies
Problem
A visibility gap does not tell you what to write
Your team still has to connect the prompt, models, competitors, citations, and sentiment before anyone can make a confident content decision.
One buyer question becomes three disconnected handoffs
The writer receives fragments instead of one traceable view of the opportunity.
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
Prompt report72% visibilityStrong overall coverage, with one model missing.
Competitors12 point gapTaxes for Expats leads on this question.
Sources15 citationsEvidence is split across five observed domains.
A list of domains does not tell your writer what to do
Prompt-level frequency and competitor context turn observed citations into bounded research actions.
Selected prompt: best expat tax service for Americans abroad · Last 7 days
Raw citation list
- reddit.com4
- irs.gov3
- greenbacktaxservices.com2
Writer research actions
- Review buyer objections4 citations
- Verify filing claims3 citations
- Compare service framing2 citations
Directional evidence only. A citation does not prove why a competitor appeared.
A polished outline can still start from invented assumptions
Peekaboo stops before draft generation and keeps the writer anchored to measured AI answers.
Generated outline
Missing evidence:No tracked prompt, model coverage, competitor gap, or observed citation attached.
Find content opportunities in the prompts you already track
Start with measured visibility, model, competitor, citation, and sentiment evidence, then give your writer one focused report.
2 minutes. No credit card.
Main features
Content intelligence your writer can trace
Choose useful content opportunities from recorded AI answers, then give writers the supporting evidence.
Opportunity snapshot
Find the questions where your brand is missing
Start with tracked buyer questions and compare the brands named in their answers. Review repeated gaps before choosing a content opportunity.
- Compare prompt-level visibility across all five supported models
- See run count, recency, category, intent, and citations
- Separate overall account metrics from the selected prompt
Your opportunity snapshot
Last 7 days72of 100
ChatGPT92
Gemini88
Perplexity0
AI Overview90
AI Mode90
Rules-based next steps
Compare the sources cited in those answers
Look at the pages and topics AI answers cite alongside your competitors. Use those observations as research leads when reviewing your existing content.
- Review repeated citation domains as research leads
- Close the quantified gap to the leading competitor
- Find models that ran without citing your brand
Brief progress3 recommendations
Suggested · 3In review · 1Briefed · 2Published · 4
Close the 12 point gap to Taxes for Expats2 of 4 outline steps completedHighReview reddit.com as a research leadSource evidence attached to the briefDone
Optimize the answer for Perplexity0 of 3 outline steps completedMedium
Supporting evidence
Choose the opportunity before writing the brief
Check that the gap matters to your buyers and is not already covered by a useful page. Then give the writer the relevant prompt, competitor and source evidence.
- Rank entities by prompt-level visibility and gap
- See citation frequency and the models that cited each entity
- Compare positive, neutral, and negative market language
Citation evidence
Directional research leadstaxesforexpats.comObserved with top competitor5reddit.comCommunity source4
irs.govGovernment source3A cited domain is a research lead, not proof that it caused an entity to appear.
“Great and affordable tool, very user-friendly, with deep data analysis and amazing support from the team to continually improve the process, data, and reporting. API is also very easy to use.”
Greg LacanCOORead on G2
How we get our data
Capturing real prompts, from actual user interfaces
Peekaboo tracks supported consumer interfaces and offers Claude API answers with web search. Scores and sources come together in a dashboard your whole team can read.
01Real UI
best review platform for online stores
For most online stores, three names come up consistently: Reviews.io, Trustpilot and Judge.me. Reviews.io stands out for verified buyer reviews and
Captured from actual interfaces
02Live analysis
AI Visibility ScoreAll models · Last 7 days
#BrandVis
1
Reviews.io (You)
72%
2
Trustpilot
58%
3
G2
45%
+6 ptsvs previous 7 days
Processed in real time
03Your dashboard
Visibility% of AI chats mentioning brand · Last 30 days
Reviews.io (You)
Trustpilot
15%8%0%
Jul 1Jul 15Jul 29
Track brand performance
AI model coverage
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
AI Overviews
AI Mode
Claude · Add-on
Copilot · Add-on
Copilot · Add-on
Track five supported AI search surfaces, with Claude and Microsoft Copilot tracking available as an add-on.
Book a demo
API + MCP
Ask your visibility data anything
Use your AI visibility data in the tools you already work in. Every paid plan can connect supported AI clients through MCP or use the REST API.
Connect Claude Code or another supported AI client
Read your data and make changes with the right permissions
No per-seat pricing, your whole team is included
Schedule weekly scans from your own AI agent
Peekaboo scan models
best ai visibility tool for agencies
5 models
ChatGPTcited 2 sources, you were not oneabsent
Geminino mention in the answerabsent
Perplexitylinked your comparison pagecited
AI Overviewspulled a competitor reviewabsent
AI Modenamed you third of fivementioned
Claude
Code
Check where we show up when buyers ask an AI for an agency, then tell me what to publish next.
Peekabooscan models
Peekaboofind gaps
Peekaboobuild plan
Read 7 answers. Found 3 gaps worth fixing, and wrote the plan.
Reply...
via Peekaboo MCP
Your gaps
1No page answers “best tool for agencies”8.9k
2Comparison page has no pricing table3.3k
3Zero third party reviews to cite1.5k
What you should do
Publish the agency guide this week
Fix the vs page before the next scan
Ask five clients for a public review
pushed to your backlog
“It’s been very helpful for understanding exactly how the brands we manage are showing up in LLMs and answer engines. The precise prompt tracking, along with the broader set of related prompts, is extremely valuable for showing us what to take action on and where content gaps exist.”
Ash RomoSenior Manager, Brand Reputation and Social MediaAgent Advice
Pricing
Pay for what you track, nothing else
Move the sliders and your price updates as you go. Every plan starts at $30 a month.
Your price
…
/mo
The Only Plan
Updating your price…
1 brand 40 prompts checked every 2 days on 3 AI models
Free report: no credit card. Monitoring is separate. Book a demo.
Included in every plan
- Competitor share of voice
- Sentiment and framing analysis
- Citation sources per answer
- Looker Studio reporting
- Workspace seats
- Prompt suggestions built in
- White-label reportsfrom $100/mo
- Share linksfrom $100/mo
Change plans or cancel from your dashboard, any time.
1 brand
Each brand gets its own prompts, competitors and dashboard.
175150
40 prompts
The questions you want to rank for in AI answers.
38269500
AI models to track
3 models
Track fewer models and your price drops with them.
Add-on models
Book a meeting
Claude API
Microsoft Copilot
Tracking frequency
Every 2 days
How often we re-run every prompt across the models you track.
Want a plan that suits your budget? Adjust the number of prompts and tracking frequency
Playbook
Use content intelligence without guessing what to publish
Three steps that keep the writer focused on the evidence that matters.
Testimonials
Hear what leading marketers say about Peekaboo
Peekaboo became an essential part of our marketing intelligence stack. It gives us clear visibility into where and how our brand is mentioned across LLMs, and helps us identify the content being picked up and how we compare to competitors.
We knew LLMs were driving traffic, but we had no visibility into where we appeared. Peekaboo gave us clear insight into our mentions, our gaps, and opportunities. It is now essential for tracking and improving our share of voice across AI platforms.
The team behind Peekaboo has been great to work with. They're quick to help, open to feedback, and genuinely care about improving the product. It feels like they're partners in our success, not just software providers
FAQ
Questions, answered
Does Peekaboo build a prompt-level content brief?
Yes. Content Briefs uses repeated stored runs to assemble model coverage, competitors, sources to beat, sentiment context, warnings, and recommended actions. It does not write or publish a complete article.
How many sources are available per response?
The count depends on what the supported surface returned or exposed for that prompt and run. Some responses contain several citations; others may have none.
Will a new page change the next AI answer?
Not necessarily. Use later runs to observe whether responses changed, but do not treat timing alone as proof that one page caused the movement.
