Clear visibility opportunityCommercial Intent
What does a streamlined filing package cost?
1/100 visibility10 model responsesUpdated Sep 1
Build your AI content strategy from real answers
Build a content strategy for AI search around the questions your buyers ask. Review competitor gaps and cited sources, then give writers the evidence they need.
Find opportunities
Compare visibility
Review evidence
Export the brief
Content opportunities
Know what to improve next
Opportunity queue
Buyer questions worth reviewing
Ready to reviewComparisons
Bright!Tax vs Greenback: which should I use?
40/100 visibility13 model responsesUpdated Sep 2
Ready to reviewBest in Category
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
73/100 visibility15 model responsesUpdated Sep 2
Gathering evidenceProduct Discovery
Which expat tax firms include CPA review?
6/100 visibility3 model responsesUpdated Aug 31
Waiting for 1 moremodel response
No tracked questions match this view.
Content opportunity, last 7 days
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
15AI answers analyzed
5Models observed
3Other entities found
3Next steps prepared
Bright!Tax is visible, but Taxes for Expats leads this buyer question.
Review the next steps first, then use the supporting evidence to shape the content plan.
12 point gapCoverage noteUse the brief as directional evidence. Check the full recorded answers before publishing a claim.
Brief map
Your opportunity snapshot
Prompt evidence73of 100
ChatGPT92
Gemini88
Perplexity0
AI Overview90
AI Mode90
Recommended next steps
Rules-based1Review taxesforexpats.com as a research lead
It appears repeatedly in the recorded answers for this buyer question.
Source lead2Close the 12 point visibility gap
Taxes for Expats currently leads this tracked question.
Competitor gap3Improve coverage in Perplexity
This model has the weakest Bright!Tax visibility in the selected range.
Model gapWho appears in AI answers
Selected prompt| Entity | Visibility | Gap | Cited by |
|---|---|---|---|
 Taxes for Expats | 84 | +12 | |
| 72 | You | ||
 Greenback | 65 | -7 |
Citations observed for this prompt
Directional evidencetaxesforexpats.comObserved with the leading competitor5reddit.comCommunity source4
irs.govGovernment source3Treat these domains as research leads, not proof that a source caused an entity to appear.
How AI describes the market
15 confident resultsBright!Tax
Positive 80%Neutral 13%Negative 7%
Taxes for Expats
Positive 67%Neutral 27%Negative 6%
Trusted by brands
Trusted by agencies
Problem
A keyword and word count do not explain the AI answer you need to change
Writers need the losing prompt, competing brands, returned sources, and evidence limits before an outline becomes useful.
One buyer question becomes three disconnected handoffs
The writer receives fragments instead of one traceable view of the opportunity.
What is the best expat tax service for Americans abroad?
Prompt report72% visibilityStrong overall coverage, with one model missing.
Competitors12 point gapTaxes for Expats leads on this question.
Sources15 citationsEvidence is split across five observed domains.
A list of domains does not tell your writer what to do
Prompt-level frequency and competitor context turn observed citations into bounded research actions.
Selected prompt: best expat tax service for Americans abroad · Last 7 days
Raw citation list
- reddit.com4
- irs.gov3
- greenbacktaxservices.com2
Writer research actions
- Review buyer objections4 citations
- Verify filing claims3 citations
- Compare service framing2 citations
Directional evidence only. A citation does not prove why a competitor appeared.
A polished outline can still start from invented assumptions
Peekaboo stops before draft generation and keeps the writer anchored to measured AI answers.
Generated outline
Missing evidence:No tracked prompt, model coverage, competitor gap, or observed citation attached.
Build content briefs from the prompts you already track
Start with a commercial buyer question, review the gap, and carry the supporting response evidence into the writer handoff.
2 minutes. No credit card.
Main features
Give content teams an AI search brief they can inspect
Connect one buyer question to its real visibility gap, source pattern, competitors, sentiment context, and recommended actions.
Opportunity snapshot
Start with one buyer question and its real visibility gap
Every brief is tied to one tracked prompt, so the writer sees where your brand stands and which model needs attention.
- Compare prompt-level visibility across all five supported models
- See run count, recency, category, intent, and citations
- Separate overall account metrics from the selected prompt
Your opportunity snapshot
Last 7 days72of 100
ChatGPT92
Gemini88
Perplexity0
AI Overview90
AI Mode90
Rules-based next steps
Know what the evidence supports before anyone starts writing
Peekaboo suggests next steps for the gaps it finds, with the competitor results and AI answers behind each suggestion.
- Review repeated citation domains as research leads
- Close the quantified gap to the leading competitor
- Find models that ran without citing your brand
Recommended next steps
3 prepared1Review reddit.com as a research lead
Observed where Taxes for Expats also appears.
Source lead2Close the 12 point visibility gap
Taxes for Expats currently leads this prompt.
Competitor gap3Optimize for Perplexity
The model ran but did not cite Bright!Tax.
Model gapSupporting evidence
Trace the brief back to competitors, citations, and sentiment
The writer can inspect what AI answers contained without mistaking an observed source for proof of causation.
- Rank entities by prompt-level visibility and gap
- See citation frequency and the models that cited each entity
- Compare positive, neutral, and negative market language
Citation evidence
Directional research leadstaxesforexpats.comObserved with top competitor5reddit.comCommunity source4
irs.govGovernment source3A cited domain is a research lead, not proof that it caused an entity to appear.
“It gave us an instant snapshot of value: within a short space of time we had something concrete enough to build benchmarks from, which is rare for a space this new. The team is also genuinely hands-on: they’ve shaped parts of the product around our needs off the back of our visibility data, rather than handing over a fixed tool and walking away. AI visibility is one of the hottest topics right now and they’re moving faster than most established brands could, guiding the conversation on what the data should actually do rather than just reacting to demand.”
Richard BallHead of Demand GenerationRead on G2
How we get our data
Capturing real prompts, from actual user interfaces
Peekaboo tracks supported consumer interfaces and offers Claude API answers with web search. Scores and sources come together in a dashboard your whole team can read.
01Real UI
best review platform for online stores
For most online stores, three names come up consistently: Reviews.io, Trustpilot and Judge.me. Reviews.io stands out for verified buyer reviews and
Captured from actual interfaces
02Live analysis
AI Visibility ScoreAll models · Last 7 days
#BrandVis
1
Reviews.io (You)
72%
2
Trustpilot
58%
3
G2
45%
+6 ptsvs previous 7 days
Processed in real time
03Your dashboard
Visibility% of AI chats mentioning brand · Last 30 days
Reviews.io (You)
Trustpilot
15%8%0%
Jul 1Jul 15Jul 29
Track brand performance
AI model coverage
ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
AI Overviews
AI Mode
Claude · Add-on
Copilot · Add-on
Copilot · Add-on
Track five supported AI search surfaces, with Claude and Microsoft Copilot tracking available as an add-on.
Book a demo
API + MCP
Ask your visibility data anything
Use your AI visibility data in the tools you already work in. Every paid plan can connect supported AI clients through MCP or use the REST API.
Connect Claude Code or another supported AI client
Read your data and make changes with the right permissions
No per-seat pricing, your whole team is included
Schedule weekly scans from your own AI agent
Peekaboo scan models
best ai visibility tool for agencies
5 models
ChatGPTcited 2 sources, you were not oneabsent
Geminino mention in the answerabsent
Perplexitylinked your comparison pagecited
AI Overviewspulled a competitor reviewabsent
AI Modenamed you third of fivementioned
Claude
Code
Check where we show up when buyers ask an AI for an agency, then tell me what to publish next.
Peekabooscan models
Peekaboofind gaps
Peekaboobuild plan
Read 7 answers. Found 3 gaps worth fixing, and wrote the plan.
Reply...
via Peekaboo MCP
Your gaps
1No page answers “best tool for agencies”8.9k
2Comparison page has no pricing table3.3k
3Zero third party reviews to cite1.5k
What you should do
Publish the agency guide this week
Fix the vs page before the next scan
Ask five clients for a public review
pushed to your backlog
“The visibility metrics allow us to clearly prove the concept to clients. Their in-depth dashboard and the range of metrics have made a significant difference in our retention rates. We also use it as a sales tool to highlight the gap between our clients’ brands and their competitors.”
Michael K.New Business DirectorRead on G2
Pricing
Pay for what you track, nothing else
Move the sliders and your price updates as you go. Every plan starts at $30 a month.
Your price
…
/mo
The Only Plan
Updating your price…
1 brand 40 prompts checked every 2 days on 3 AI models
Free report: no credit card. Monitoring is separate. Book a demo.
Included in every plan
- Competitor share of voice
- Sentiment and framing analysis
- Citation sources per answer
- Looker Studio reporting
- Workspace seats
- Prompt suggestions built in
- White-label reportsfrom $100/mo
- Share linksfrom $100/mo
Change plans or cancel from your dashboard, any time.
1 brand
Each brand gets its own prompts, competitors and dashboard.
175150
40 prompts
The questions you want to rank for in AI answers.
38269500
AI models to track
3 models
Track fewer models and your price drops with them.
Add-on models
Book a meeting
Claude API
Microsoft Copilot
Tracking frequency
Every 2 days
How often we re-run every prompt across the models you track.
Want a plan that suits your budget? Adjust the number of prompts and tracking frequency
Playbook
How content teams use an AI search brief
Choose one commercial question, read the evidence before the next steps, and export a traceable handoff for editorial review.
Testimonials
Hear what leading marketers say about Peekaboo
Peekaboo became an essential part of our marketing intelligence stack. It gives us clear visibility into where and how our brand is mentioned across LLMs, and helps us identify the content being picked up and how we compare to competitors.
We knew LLMs were driving traffic, but we had no visibility into where we appeared. Peekaboo gave us clear insight into our mentions, our gaps, and opportunities. It is now essential for tracking and improving our share of voice across AI platforms.
The team behind Peekaboo has been great to work with. They're quick to help, open to feedback, and genuinely care about improving the product. It feels like they're partners in our success, not just software providers
FAQ
Clear answers to common questions
Does this replace my content brief tool?
Not necessarily. Peekaboo supplies prompt-level AI-answer evidence and a Markdown handoff. Keep the editorial, brand, SEO, and production requirements your existing workflow already handles.
How quickly will published content change an AI answer?
There is no guaranteed timeline. Use later completed runs to observe changes, and do not treat a coincident movement as proof that one page caused it.
What evidence is included in a Content Brief?
After at least three stored runs in the selected window, a brief can include model coverage, competitors, sources to beat, sentiment context, warnings, and recommended actions for that prompt.
